Skip to content

chemistry of the great big blue

January 7, 2010

As my fellow fry-entists can attest, we know so little about the oceans that every deep sea expedition yields a handful of new species to describe, focus on saving one species may come at the demise of another, and people still won’t go swimming in some areas for fear Jaws will eat them.  And that’s just a quick sampling of what we’ve written so far.  The depth of our societal ignorance about the ocean and how it functions is enormous.  Just as the fishermen of days gone by used to think that the sea offered God’s unlimited bounty, modern day people don’t seem to understand that the ocean isn’t an endlessly large dumping ground for all things undesired in our terrestrial lives.  From trash to carbon dioxide to birth control pills, our oceans are the unfortunate downstream victims of human decisions.  We don’t understand the impacts, sources, or even types of chemicals that are ending up flushed to the seas. One of my new year’s resolutions is to become more acquainted with the chemicals of the great big sea.  Today’s profiled chemical: the unknown.

Over 10,000 new chemicals are produced each year, mostly in industry where they will be deployed for commercial use.  At least in the US, these chemicals are only regulated after they are commercially released unless they are for clinical purposes.  That means that a product could be on the market for years before anyone even realizes that it’s getting into the environment, let alone that it’s toxic and should be contained.  And even this broken system has only cancelled the registration for a mere handful of chemicals, mostly pesticides and mostly after protest.  In fact, their pesticide website boasts “EPA does not maintain a list of canceled pesticides”.  Other chemicals are even more difficult to find information on.

Shoutouts for collecting information have go to Toxipedia that attempts to keep an encyclopedia and running news headlines pertaining to all things chemical in the environment.  A recent link from them provides the perfect example of ‘the unknown’ that is contaminating our water.  All that Tamiflu that people took for fear of swine flu earlier this fall has found its way to the rivers of Japan.  Likely other countries will have similar results once they stop to look.  Yes, this is indicative that our wastewater is far inadequate when it comes to treating pharmaceuticals in sewage, but this finding also stresses the need to take a closer look at what is escaping our communities.  Who knows what Tamiflu in the rivers will do to the fish communities, the estuaries where the chemicals eventually settle, or the even the next year’s stock of flu viruses that now live in a world with a chronic dose of antivirals.  Resistance, anyone?

Another shoutout goes to USGS, which started the National Reconnaissance of Pharmaceuticals, Hormones, and other Contaminants in US Streams.  For the marine world that I work in, this is a leading model from our upstream neighbors taking a look at what they send down to us here at the coast.  It’s nice to have the weight and wallets of the US government helping in the investigation for ’emerging contaminants’ as these chemicals have come to be known.  Because running hundreds of thousands of water samples from all over the country through a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer is not cheap or easy.  But it’s necessary in the quest to understand what we as a species are exposing ourselves and our biosphere to.

Hopefully shining stars like these will continue to find funding for us toxicologists and help to get the word out about the results.  We all have a right to know what we’re exposed to that may affect our health.  Those of us who are the downstream end of the line depend on whistleblowers upstream to at least let us know what to look for.  Especially since tomorrow 27 new chemicals will join the open market.

3 Comments leave one →
  1. January 7, 2010 1:35 am

    Very interesting. It’s really hard to fathom how much artificial chemicals and products seriously permeate the environment in every ecosystem in every way imaginable. Especially plastics and pharmaceuticals, like you mentioned.

  2. January 7, 2010 9:01 pm

    Scary to think of how blase people are about pollutants, I think it’s because we can’t see them. Out of sight shouldn’t mean out of mind, and the birth control part freaks me out the most – hormones in the water is NOT a good thing.


  1. Tweets that mention chemistry of the great big blue « Southern Fried Science --

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Authors

    The Southern Fried Scientist

    Andrew is a graduate student in North Carolina studying deep sea biology. When not in the lab, he spends his time out on the water, usually swearing at his boat while simultaneously sacrificing some important tool to Poseidon in a desperate attempt to make the motor start. That is, assuming he can get his truck running long enough to actually put the boat in the water. He enjoys long walks on the beach, by necessity. Follow him on Twitter @SFriedScientist.


    David is a graduate student in South Carolina studying shark conservation. He is the author of the upcoming book “Why Sharks Matter: Using New Environmentalism to Show The Economic And Ecological Importance of Sharks, The Threats They Face, and How You Can Help”. His time is divided between educating the public about sharks, spending days at a time at sea playing with sharks, and eating horribly unhealthy foods. Follow him on Twitter @WhySharksMatter.

    bluegrass blue crab

    Amy is a graduate student in North Carolina studying local ecological knowledge within the blue crab fishery. She spends half her life studying the most charismatic of organisms - humans - and the estuaries on which they depend. While not contemplating grand social theories, she enjoys a good jam session and watching sunsets over the estuary. Follow her on Twitter @bgrassbluecrab.

  • Recent Comments

    Scientia Pro Publica… on Beyond Salmon
    Carnival of Evolutio… on Blogging for Darwin: What is a…
    Tara W on The ecological disaster that i…
    How to use a drip co… on How to brew beer in a coffee m…
    Beste Angebot IMAX:… on Follow David Honig’s Ant…
    » Flush With E… on 365 days of Darwin: February 4…
    Rui Monteiro on Blogging for Darwin: What is a…
    Rui Monteiro on Blogging for Darwin: What is a…
    Scientists For Sanit… on Van Jones: Good riddance
    Jack Perez has my su… on Interview with Mega Shark vs.…
  • Highest Rated Posts and Comments

  • Current Popular Posts

  • Resources

  • RSS What the Southern Fried Scientist is reading.

  • Archive

  • Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 42 other followers

    %d bloggers like this: